Main | February 2006 »

Black Coffee Blues

I woke up this morning feeling anti-corporate. A strange way to wake up, surely. Groggy, grumpy, chipper, hungover—all seem more reasonable. But no, my first thought upon opening my eyes this morning was damn it, fuck the Man! This, due to two experiences yesterday evening, both of which must have burrowed into my subconcsious right before beddy-bye . First, reading a short article in the newest issue of Seed about corporate lobbyists trying to own time.  No, not the magazine, but time itself. Here is what Joshua Roebke wrote:

The earth's rotation is slowing—thanks, moon—and each day grows longer. So every year or two, the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service, a little-known cabal of geophysicists, tells the world to add a leap second to civic time so it can catch up. But the Sevice has some competition: A consortium of corporate interests wants to end our clocks's connection with the natural world by 2007—mostly because their global positioning satellites weren't programmed to deal with leap seconds. If they have their way, the earth will spin gradually out of phase with watches, until night becomes day (well, in 5,200 years sunrise will be just an hour later, but still.) More immediately, astronomers and other scientists who rely on the coordination of times for experiments are outraged that corporate interests might hijack time for their own purposes.

Okay, there's a lot missing here—who and what is this "consortium of corporate interests"—and Roebke makes the point that the change would be all but imperceptible to us. But I can't help but be with him on that but still—the audacity, the balls of business to want to change the way we record time because they can't wind the clocks on their satellites!

Second: last night I was at a bookstore and watched a celebrity drop $800 on books without batting an eye. Meanwhile I was standing in the aisles, pawing at the twenty in my pocket, wondering if I should buy the new book by Willam Vollmann or that darned copy of Seed. I had to weigh my immediate future: tomorrow I'm going to need coffee, and I really need a haircut. So I went for the $4.95 purchase. Then I stood in line for ten full minutes watching this woman buy about eight photography books, a mess of British tabloids, and smattering of nonfiction. I watched the total come to about $650, and then she sneezed out two more gargantuan art books that piled on another $150. Literally gargantuan, as in so big the store didn't have a bag that either book would fit. Eight Hundred Dollars later, I purchased my meager magazine as I watched her and her companion stumble and giggle their way out of the store. Nothing wrong with being wealthy, but I've never actually wacthed someone crap a grand out their ass and then giggle like they made a pooter. And—if I may extend this crass analogy—like your own stinky farts, it was a little awesome and a little gross.

And now here I am, the next morning, my disgust with wealth and corporate interest still lingering. I left my self-righteous Punk Rock anti-corporate snobbery behind long ago, but this morning it's there, underlying my typical pre-coffee curmudgeonliness. So what can I do but protest? No Starbucks today, no Coffee Bean, no Peet's. I'm going to the Delocator and I'm finding me a mom-and-pop coffee. It's that little, unrelated protest for protest's sake that will make me feel better (also, the caffeine). It won't make me richer and it won't take power away from corporate lobbyists; but it will give me a chance to savor the morning—something that will be harder to do in 5,200 years!—and it might give me stinky farts. Sometimes that's all the little guy can do.

Olivo Barbieri: Site Specific

08la_t
Santa Monica Pier, Los Angles

I was thumbing through the newest issue of Metropolis over the weekend and was stopped cold by the photos of Olivo Barbieri. Barbieri takes ariel photographs using a tilt-shift lens, which apparently gives his shots their "model" effect. (I can't imagine it's as simple as a lens choice, but I'll let Barbieri keep his secret as long as he keeps making work like this. More images and a short article are at the Metropolis website.

06vegas_t
The New York-New York Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas

14rome_t
An aqueduct on the periphery of Rome

Yesterday's News—Today!

A few short takes from around the interweb:

Land+Living does a pretty good job of getting you up to speed on the landscape architect Ken Smith’s recently awarded Orange County Great Park project. Smith will be the master planner, with the architect Enrique Norton, public-works artist Mary Miss, and LA-based  landscape architect Mia Lehrer in tow. The park will be larger than both Central Park and Golden Gate Park, and the defining element will be a canyon that Smith will “build,” running seventy feet deep and two miles long. (I’ve been getting a kick out of everyone saying he’s going to “build a canyon.” When I was a kid, I used to try and build a hole all the way to China.) In addition to L+L, the LA Times had two articles on the announcement in yesterday’s paper, and Curbed LA also has a snarky post.

Pruned is probably my favorite site on the interweb. Alexander Trevi has a great eye for visually stunning imagery. His most recent post is no exception. Here’s a sampling:

060124_2_meteorological_1

More images of this nature at his site, and take some time to dig around if you’ve never been there before.

—The New York Times had an entertaining little article about scientists who, while studying the workings of the brain, accidentally discovered schadenfreude.

—Last but least, Pitchfork has the latest on the ever-growing legend/parody that is Axl Rose’s comeback of the century, Chinese Democracy.

Looking Back to Look Forward

It seems like everyone has been doffing their caps to the late ‘70s/early ‘80s lately, whether Gang of Four, Talking Heads, the Pretenders, or what have you. I could be a cynic about it but I won’t. For one, it’s too reductive and unfair. And quite frankly this is the first time in years I’ve been excited about buying new rock albums. Back in the mid/late-‘90s I was so enamored with Drive Like Jehu that all other rock bands sounded trite by comparison. So I delved into singer-songwriters, space rock, and electronica instead. (You could say I was hibernating until emo ran its course.) But in the last year I’ve picked up the Futureheads, the Kaiser Chiefs, Bloc Party, Clap Your Hands, and many others.

Many if not all of these groups would not be here today without the post-punk of twenty-five years ago. But despite (or because of) the obvious influence, rock seems fresh again. I actually listen to the radio on a regular basis! (Of course, it doesn’t hurt that I’m spoiled by a rare town that has many great radio stations). But like all trends—whether 1983 or 2006—the current sound is sure to evolve. If this were any other era, I’d be hunkering down for the storm of pretenders at this point—you can be sure there’s going to be band appearing this year from nowhere that looks like the Arcade Fire but sounds like Coldplay. (Hell, we’ve already got She Wants Revenge, an insipid rehash of Interpol, who I didn’t even realize you could rip off since they were so indebted to Joy Division in the first place.) But to tell the truth I’m feeling optimistic this time around.

Ten years ago these bands just wouldn’t have caught on beyond the local indie record store set. They’d have had the Velvet Underground Effect—they’d have sold 100 records and inspired 100 kids to start bands. But in the era of Pitchfork, iTunes, and the OC, they’re finding ever wider audiences. It just goes to show that there’s nothing too sophisticated about good rock music; it can find pop success. In fact I’d even say that a metal band like System of a Down, who is ridiculously more successful than Clap Your Hands, Arcade Fire, and Bloc Party combined, is more musically sophisticated and challenging. Not that that means they’re much good, but the point is that pop audiences can handle smart, perhaps abrasive music that isn’t afraid to take a few esoteric side trips.

So the question is, where is the trend headed? In the world of pop music, the answer to that question often lies in where it has already been. Should we prepare for a New New Wave? I hope not. I’m still sick of Men Without Hats and The Fixx; I hardly want anyone to pick up that gauntlet. No, there are better options than that. In today’s era it’s so easy to find a band from decades past that didn’t get its proper due. I vote we look there for inspiration. A great place to do just that is postpunkjunk.com. The mp3 blog is run by Bret B., a KXLU DJ (Tuesdays, 10am-2pm PST) and is dedicated to just what I’ve been yammering on about: looking back to look forward. Each daily post is a collection of songs by a band from the late ’70s or early ‘80s that my money says you haven’t heard of, paired with a sampling of a band from the here and now, if not carrying on in style then at least doing so in spirit. I’ve only just begun to dig through the archives there, but I’m having a ball. I recommend you check it out if you want to be on the ground floor for who’s the next shit—or better yet, if you want to find something that will inspire you to do it yourself.

Rem Koolhaas on Fire!

Pradafire

Wow, Rem Koolhaas's uber-cool Prada Store in SoHo apparently went up in flames over the weekend... More information at Curbed, the Gutter, and Verbose Coma (which has more pictures like the one above).

Light is the New Lycra

Portable_light

Via core77: Portable Light is a nonprofit initiative dedicated to bringing light to poor communities living off the grid in third-world nations. What’s particularly fascinating about it is just how the light is portable: it’s woven into fabric. You can fold it, ball it up, or even wear it, and it generates enough light to read or work by.

The remarkable energy efficiency of high brightness solid state lighting (HBLEDs) means that a bright digital light of 80 lumens per watt (bright enough to read, work and illuminate areas at night) can be produced by a single miniature diode and powered by small areas of flexible photo-voltaic (solar panels). Portable Light expands the value of miniature solid state electronics by putting digital light into a textile medium to create cost effective, completely portable, off-the-grid light engines that can be deployed at a global scale wherever energy efficient electrical power and illumination are needed.

...

Portable Light initiatives are currently underway in a number of countries. Portable Light in the Sierra Madre will enable Huichol women to harvest electrical power from the sun, own and carry their own light with them, and use it to improve literacy, create better options for education, increase household income and improve family health and nutrition. This pilot project will create immediate, direct and tangible benefits for Huichol women and their families—bringing light to serve a collective community group of more than 300 people in the Huichol Sierra.

You can see much more—how it works, where the initiatives are underway, and how to contribute, at the Portable Light website.

Subtle Technologies

This is pretty academic, but might be of interest to you if (a) you appreciate that this blog tries to thread different interests together, and (b) you are in fact an academic. Subtle Technologies is a symposium happening this summer in Toronto, in tandem with the equally (if not more) fascinating SoundAxis festival.

CALL FOR SUBMISSIONS

Proposals are invited for presentation at the
2006 Subtle Technologies Symposium
June 1st - June 4th, 2006
Toronto, Canada

DEADLINE: January 31st, 2006

Subtle Technologies is a four-day multidisciplinary event exploring complex and subtle relationships between art and science. Subtle Technologies' mandate is to blur the boundaries between art and science. The annual event combines symposia, exhibitions and performances that juxtapose cutting-edge artistic projects and scientific exploration.

This year's theme for Subtle Technologies is Responsive Architectures. We are interested in investigating how environments and systems can interact and respond to their occupants. We hope for wide-ranging discussions and presentations that explore dynamic systems and environments at every scale, from molecules to continents.  Extraordinary new qualities are emerging in the 'responsive' systems that are rapidly being integrated throughout our world, exploiting leaps in technology. This transformation creates critical questions as our capacity to change the world grows, for good and for ill.

The symposium encourages a wide definition of architecture that encompasses buildings, mechanical and natural environments. Three kinds of submissions are especially invited. Scientists are invited to contribute current research that relates to the topic. Artists, architects, designers and performers are invited to contribute their ongoing creative work. Writers are invited to contribute discussions of philosophy, history and theory. A range of approaches are welcome including interdisciplinary work that combines these approaches, specialized presentation proposals that focus on a single topic in depth, and general discussions that draw upon multiple topics. To complement the Toronto-wide SoundaXis festival occurring in parallel with Subtle Technologies, sound and acoustics will be a special focus.

Examples of possible topics include:

    * Interactive systems
    * Adaptive environments
    * Hybrid ecologies
    * Smart materials
    * Buildings that can move and transform
    * Extended physiology
    * Complex systems analysis
    * Expanded perception
    * Resonance and spatial acoustics

    * Physics of sound

More info at the Subtle Technologies site.

Be Patient; it's Going to be Neat

The New Horizons spacecraft is slated to launch today, just after lunch if you’re on the east coast, and some time after you show up for work if you’re on the west. (NASA, I think, has a more specific timeline.) The craft is going to head for Pluto—the first up close study of the planet we’ve ever done. Stay tuned in 2015 for more info there. Equally fascinating is that New Horizons won’t be done once it’s waved to Pluto. Next on its agenda is the rest of the Kuiper Belt, that ring of icy rocks floating around the edge of our solar system, of which Pluto was the biggest icy rock—that is, until they discovered our tenth planet about a year ago. Yeah, I didn’t get the memo either, but apparently we’ve grown to an even ten. It’s not official yet (hence the planet’s current nom de plume, 2003 UB313), but there is a rock out there—three times further from the sun than Pluto—that is so far the largest object in the Kuiper Belt (about three times larger than Pluto). The exciting news is that, as our observations of the Kuiper Belt gets more sophisticated, there is a good chance that we will find more objects that might also constitute planetary status. (Suddenly I have the lyrics to "Splish Splash" in my head—how was I to know there was a party goin' on?)

You can find more information on the story behind New Horizons over at Space.com. Meanwhile, there's a committee out there currently weighing potential names for our new addition. According to the show Passport to Pluto, which is airing all the time on the Discovery Science channel this month, the man who discovered the planet has been referring to it as Xena. I'm willing to bet this is why his bosses decided maybe a committee was a good idea.

Literary Jenga

My wife and I spent much of last night re-"shelving" our books—a term I use loosely since we have no actual bookshelves, but rather we artfully pile them in one corner of our living room. (and, full disclosure: she did the vast majority of the work, bless her heart.) But as lovely as our books look crawling up the walls, I wish we'd thought of something a little more elaborate, such as the installation by the artist Matej Krén I just saw at Booklust.

Lostinbooks1

Lostinbooks4

The piece is part of Beauty and the Book, an exhibition at the Israel Museum in Jeruselem.

Underneath the Covers

Identity Theory has an interview with Chip Kidd, a talented designer and entertaining personality. But if you've overdosed on Kidd (and if you've had your share of conversations about book cover design, you might have had your fill), you can always go to this site for a little perspective. It's got loads of contemporary book covers by a variety of designers, on which you can post your professional or not-so opinions (you can also search by designer, which is nice). Too, Betablog points to a webcast archive  of talks at the Walker Art Center which you can download, including one by Paul Sahre, who is responsible for perhaps my favorite book cover of the last few years, Killing the Buddha. (The Walker site also has numerous lectures and interviews with the likes of John Baldessari, Merce Cunningham, David Straitharn, and many many more.)

prettygoes at gmail com

Blog powered by TypePad