« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

Colson Whitehead: Apex Hides the Hurt (redux)

Whiteheadapex_1

[In conjunction with the paperback release of Apex Hides the Hurt—and to distract you from the fact that I haven't been posting quite as frequently lately—here's a rerun of my review of Colson Whitehead's latest, originally posted last year.]

I root for Colson Whitehead, as you know. The Intuitionist came along in my life at a time when I really needed something to knock me out, and it more than did the job. I’ve had my eyes on Whitehead ever since. Even though I didn’t think his second novel, John Henry Days, was terribly successful, I still respected it. The Colossus of New York, a book of paeans to the city released last year, was a showcase for his rhythmic prose, though what I really wanted was a new novel.  Finally it has arrived: Apex Hides the Hurt. And while I enjoyed it more than JHD, Whitehead still hasn’t reached the heights that The Intuitionist hinted he could achieve.

I whipped through Apex faster than anything I’ve read in at least the last year. I chewed it up in just two days, which if nothing else is a testament to Whitehead's gift for prose and pacing. Apex has an inventive premise and plot and plenty of beautiful lines to keep your eyes dancing. The story revolves around a “nomenclature consultant”—a man whose profession is to name things, be they cars, pills, or bandages. He holds his profession in high regard; like Lila Mae in The Intuitionist, it’s more a craft than a job. He can do this virtually in his sleep (as when a car company wants to name a new product “the something 100,” and he simply says “give them a Q,” and the Q-100 is born). This obsessive attention to work as craft is partly what imbibed The Intuitionist with so much life, and what to a lesser extent keeps much of Apex afloat. But Lila Mae’s knowledge was intertwined with a fight—she was the best at what she did, but she was at the very bottom of the ladder (er, elevator shaft), career-wise. The protagonist of Apex is the opposite: thanks to Apex bandages, he is legendary in his field, but after an inexplicably ludicrous toe injury (again, partly thanks to Apex) he loses the drive. He leaves the business.

The novel really begins when our protagonist is pulled back into the game. He is referred by his old boss to Winthrop, a small but growing town looking to rebrand itself. The city council is made up of three people: Albie Winthrop, the eccentric but financially ruined namesake of the town; Mayor Regina Goode, whose local ancestry goes even further back than Albie’s; and Lucky Aberdeen, the new millionaire on the block, who has a serious financial stake in raising the profile and desirability of the town. It only takes a 2–1 majority to rename the town, but each of course has their own idea—one wants it to stay as is, one to return to its original, pre-Winthrop designation, and one for a brand new name for the future. Hence, the nomenclature consultant is brought in to arbitrate. He does so, but on the condition that what he ultimately chooses must go, for a minimum of one year. The councilmembers take the gamble, and the rest of the novel concerns our protagonist’s research into the town’s history and each of the three councilmembers’ overtures for their proposed names.

At the core of the book is an existential battle—what is a thing, or a town, or a person; and what is its name? Are they one and the same? Can the name change but the essence remain unchanged, or is the name more important than the essence? Its no coincidence that our protagonist is given no name, yet he believes it is just that which confers immortality on a thing. Wrapped up in this question is the history of America itself: is “America” the nation that once enslaved a people? Is it the country that drives today’s global economy? Can it be one and the same? Just what does that word mean, anyway, America? Once, after all, it was someone's name.

In the end, our protagonist claims a name for the town, and one that perhaps could best sum up what America does mean in each and all of its moments in history. As far as the allegorical nature of the book goes, it works well. But this is at the expense of the plot; at one point he realizes that his clients are more than the three members of the city council, but the thousands of people that live there now and will live there in the future. Yet he seems to disregard all of them when he makes his final decision. If I lived in Winthrop, I know I’d be pissed to learn the new name of my town. Then again, Truth or Consequences, NM isn’t a ghost town, so I guess not everything is in a name.

Ultimately, Apex is a good novel, but flawed. The same could be said for all of Whitehead’s books. While I recommend The Intuitionist to anyone who will listen, I also recognize that it jumps the tracks here and there. And John Henry Days is much too all over the place, for my tastes—the book is meant to be a chorus of plots, but the result is too fragmented. With Apex, Whitehead has managed to rein things in and keep his plot more focused than ever, but in the process he sacrifices the depth that characterized his two previous novels. As most any other review of this book as also made clear, it’s not much of a stretch to use the band-aid as a metaphor for contemporary race relations—I get it, there’s a festering wound under that flesh-colored piece of tape. Nor is it pushing any envelopes to anchor your themes to the double-edged cliché, a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet/you can’t polish a turd. Whitehead makes a go of tackling large, complex ideas about race in America, but it’s been done better in the past, both by others and by him.

Yet I have trouble being completely negative about this novel. Despite the flaws here and his other books, I nevertheless like all of them. Whitehead knows how to make prose jump and wail, and he always spins his plots and themes in unique ways, which is more than can be said for many other writers. I feel about Apex the way I feel when my favorite band puts out a less-than-stellar album. Even flawed, it’s better than much of the dreck out there. My disappointment in the novel is due in large part to my high standards for Whitehead in particular. The result is a book I can’t help but simultaneously complain about and recommend. If you've never read Whitehead before, start with The Intuitionist. If you crave more after that, come over to Apex.

Dreamgirls: And I Am Telling You—Go Away

Dreamgirls_1

Since Dreamgirls got snubbed for best picture last week, numerous journalists, critics, and industry folk have been intepreting it as some sort of sign of the apocalypse. Dreamgirls didn't get nominated? Have you looked outside the window to see if the sky is still blue? The grass still green? The latest in a long (and growing) line of articles investigating this catastrophe comes in today's New York Times. But wait! Don't bother reading the article, I can spare you litany of excuses. I saw Dreamgirls this weekend and explanation is actually quite simple: this movie stinks.

Jennifer Hudson was the best thing about the movie, yes. And her rendition of the "And I am Telling You I Am Not Going" was the highlight of the film, yes. And she deserves the Oscar over the ten-year-old from Little Miss Sunshine, yes.

But let's talk plot: cliche, cliche, cliche. Let's talk Eddie Murphy: not bad, but grossly overrated. Let's talk songs: except for maybe three--the aforementioned "I Am Telling You...," "Fake Your Way to the Top," and the "Dreamgirls" theme song--they were all indistingiushable. Not to mention the entire second half is ballad after ballad after ballad, thus killing all momentum. Nevermind that this is a musical about Motown, and there were perhaps three songs total that could lay claim to that sound. And a major red flag, by the way, is that this movie begins in Motown but ends in disco--meaning that the songs are predestined to descend in quality. Great trajectory for a musical. The movie begins at one of pop music's greatest heights and ends at one of its lowest depths. No wonder the climax hits at the middle and the last hour is sheer drudgery.

The way the songs were used was inconsistent, in a frustrating way--sometimes they're sung dialogue, sometimes they're soundtrack to a montage, sometimes they're a natural part of the story, but they're none of these things frequently enough to actually serve the story in a helpful way. And where was the performance? Only a few songs involved people actually performing while they sang. Even when the song was part of a stage show, the performances (barring Murphy's James Brownisms) were wooden. More often, Bill Condon seemed to get bored of the song and instead chose to use that opportunity to move the maudlin plot forward via montage. In one fell swoop he manages to take the steam out of the song by not letting the audience enjoy it, and drains the plot of any nuance by not allowing the actors to do anything but the broadest of strokes, mute on screen as a visual cliche does their work for them.

Most of these flaws seem to be inherent to the original play. Curiously, though, and most frustrating, is that critics have noted the weakness of the songs and the predictability of the Behind the Music-esque rise, fall, and redemption plot. But they've been noting these things as if they were a minor flaws. How can you rave about a musical if the music not very good? If the songs aren't that good, the plot is cliche, the dialogue nothing special, and musical performances also not terribly great... can two supporting actors--one, really: Hudson--really make this movie that necessary to so many people?

The answer is no. There is no great mystery as to why this movie got snubbed at the Oscars. The great mystery is how it got so many nominations (and wins) elsewhere.

Do Not Rock Out with Your Cock Out: It is Not God's Way

Gotta love those Christian groups that go the trouble of watching graphic films and listening to purient music so that you don't have to. The latest is this website's list of "Gay Bands." Metallica? Kansas? Merzbow?

Speaking of Steve Roden

Speaking of Steve Roden, he’ll be presenting a new sound work at the MOCA Gallery at the Pacific Design Center in West Hollywood this weekend, January 20 and 21. The piece will only run for the weekend, and accompany the Rothko show currently on display there (also closing this weekend, so all the more reason to go down and check it out). Roden and Rothko seems like a natural fit, to me. If you’ve not experienced Roden’s work before, you can head over to the brilliant Ubuweb to hear a five-hour piece he improvised at the 2005 Soundwalk in Long Beach.

There is a reception at the PDC MOCA on Saturday, January 20, from 6–8 pm, including a talk with architect Michael Maltzen. Whatever day you decide to go, admission is free.

Wallace Neff's Airforms

Wallace Neff is known more for his classic California-style homes (as illustrated in this book), but late in his career he really took the modernist ball and ran with it, in the form of his Airform homes. They could be confused for Fuller’s geodesic designs, but not quite. Steve Roden, he of Airform Archives (among many other pursuits), lives in the last of Neff’s airform homes (originally built for Neff’s brother Andrew, and the only airform house that has not been razed). Recently he wrote a short article about the home for msn. Do read it. And if you’re not checking Airform Archives regularly, I don’t know what to do with you. I can only tell you so many times before I have to come over and click the mouse for you.

Edward Burtynsky: Manufactured Landscape

Modern Art Notes highlights an upcoming feature-length documentary on Edward Burtynsky, premiering at the Sundance Film Festival later this month. Here's the trailer. It looks interesting (though not as interesting as a Burtynsky-directed IMAX film could be, as Green says Burtynsky has said he wants to do himself some day. Here's hoping.)

Read Some Art Blogs While You Wait

More regular posting, I think, will renew next week. In the meantime…

The Walker Art Center's blog, Off Center, asked Modern Art Notes’ Tyler Green to list his top ten art blogs [scroll down a little]. I wasn’t familiar with many of them, so I’m happy to have added them to my morning routine. In particular AFC (sorry, but I agree with Green– like Bookslut, I will avoid saying the actual [lame] name of this blog as much as I can), Alec Soth, and Edward Winkleman have become routine stops for me now. Not on Green’s list, but still new to me, is CultreGrrl, who joins Green as a new arts blog at the ArtsJournal mega-site. That too has become regular reading. I’ll be adding all of them to the blogroll shortly.

Alec Soth in particular is quite interesting right now. Apparently a month ago he did a post about Robert Polidori, Chris Jordan, and other art photographers (as opposed to photojournalists) who have used post-Katrina New Orleans as their subject. Polidori, found guilty of self-googling, commented on the post thirty days later, reacting to some of the criticisms. The comment has sparked a rash of commentary from Soth and his readers—some in that gossipy harshing that only the internet can provide, some a little more thoughtful. Have a read.

Recent Posts

prettygoes at gmail com

Powered by TypePad